UPSC Rank 301 Dispute Ends: Ghazipur’s Akanksha Singh Confirmed as CSE 2025 Qualifier

Confusion arose after two candidates named Akanksha Singh appeared to claim Rank 301 in the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2025. After verification, authorities confirmed that the candidate from Ghazipur is the official qualifier. The clarification resolved the identity mix-up that had created widespread attention online.

Rank 301 in the Civil Services Examination (CSE) 2025 created a confusion when two candidates named Akanksha Singh claimed the same rank. The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has clarified that Akanksha Singh from Ghazipur district in Uttar Pradesh is the candidate who got achieved Rank 301 in the final result.

The clash and discussion on social media as well as news reports after the candidates presented their documents claiming the same rank, led to the clarification.

Confusion Triggered by Two Candidates with the Same Name

The controversy initiated right after UPSC announced the CSE 2025 final results. Both candidates named Akanksha Singh claimed to have secured Rank 301. One of the candidate is from Ghazipur in Uttar Pradesh and another from Ara in Bihar.

The situation got worse when an admit card circulating online appeared to show the same name and roll number. This led to speculation about a possible administrative error or impersonation.

UPSC Issues Official Clarification

UPSC Issues Clarification

Amid growing uncertainty, UPSC released an official statement through the Press Information Bureau (PIB) to clarify the matter.

According to the commission, the candidate who secured Rank 301 is:

• Akanksha Singh

• Roll Number: 0856794

• Parents: Ranjit Singh and Neelam Singh

• Residence: Abhaipur village, Ghazipur district, Uttar Pradesh

The statement explained that several media reports had mentioned two candidates with the same name claiming the rank, prompting the commission to provide an official clarification.

Social Media Posts and Documents Intensified the Row

Before the clarification was issued, the Ghazipur-based candidate had shared documents on social media, alleging that her identity and rank were being misused. She also reportedly shared copies of her identification records and interview-related documents to support her claim.

Meanwhile, the candidate from Bihar continued to maintain that she had secured Rank 301 and requested further clarification from UPSC once detailed mark sheets are released.

Background of the Controversy

The dispute attracted widespread attention because the UPSC Civil Services Examination is one of the most prestigious and competitive examinations in India.

The confusion was further amplified because the Bihar-based candidate is reportedly the granddaughter of Brahmeshwar Singh, a controversial figure linked to the disbanded Ranvir Sena militia.

This added a political and public dimension to the controversy, prompting calls for an official clarification.

Controversy Comes to an End

With the official clarification, UPSC has effectively ended the confusion over Rank 301 in the CSE 2025 merit list. The commission’s confirmation establishes that the rank belongs to Akanksha Singh from Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, based on its official records.

The incident highlights how similar names and incomplete information circulating online can lead to misunderstandings during high-profile examination result announcements.

Written by Shreoshree Chakrabarty

Shreoshree Chakrabarty is an experienced content writer with over five years of professional expertise in creating engaging and impactful content across diverse formats. Over the course of her career, she has collaborated with well-known brands such as Myntra and Justdial, contributing high-quality content that aligns with brand voice and audience expectations. Academically, Shreoshree holds a Master’s degree in Mass Communication, and outside of her professional pursuits, she is an avid reader and a passionate traveller who enjoys exploring new places and cultures. She also loves watching movies, finding inspiration in cinema and literature that often reflects in her writing style.

View all posts →